hoeconomics
The branch of knowledge concerned with the decision making rules(minmax strategems) of females in general, its effects on males in general and how men can mitigate such effects. It formally explains the fundemental relationship between men and women. It is the formalised and rationalized redpill.
This discipline is not taught in schools at any level, as it is detremental to how society functions because it threatens the economic status quo. Its practicioners draw their knowledge base mostly from ecnomoics, psychology, logic and religion. Examples include Young Men's Daily Red Pill, who is to the discipline what Adam Smith is to economics. Also Rollo Tomassi who is a professor of hoeconomics at the School of The Rational Male.
It is imperative to note that this discipline is not at all new but it is the first time in history that it has been FORMALIZED. It logically ties to reality and explains the strategems used by most women to increase their gains minimum effort by using sex, flirt, and feminine wile to exploit the efforts of unsuspecting men.
Hoeconomics does not teach inceldom, misogyny, hypergamy, or any thing in particuar. It merely explains strategies used by women to exploit the labour and time of men, the men that succumb to these strategies(simpbluepill), the men that dont and the men that mitigate its effects. All it does is explain and rationalise what is already true. It is up to the students to do what they want with the knowledge.
This discipline is not taught in schools at any level, as it is detremental to how society functions because it threatens the economic status quo. Its practicioners draw their knowledge base mostly from ecnomoics, psychology, logic and religion. Examples include Young Men's Daily Red Pill, who is to the discipline what Adam Smith is to economics. Also Rollo Tomassi who is a professor of hoeconomics at the School of The Rational Male.
It is imperative to note that this discipline is not at all new but it is the first time in history that it has been FORMALIZED. It logically ties to reality and explains the strategems used by most women to increase their gains minimum effort by using sex, flirt, and feminine wile to exploit the efforts of unsuspecting men.
Hoeconomics does not teach inceldom, misogyny, hypergamy, or any thing in particuar. It merely explains strategies used by women to exploit the labour and time of men, the men that succumb to these strategies(simpbluepill), the men that dont and the men that mitigate its effects. All it does is explain and rationalise what is already true. It is up to the students to do what they want with the knowledge.
John: Man, Alice left me for some other guy. She divorced my ass after I gave her everything, took the kids and the house too! Im shook. I dont get it. I have a well paid job thats good, put a roof over our head, bought her shit. Paid her debts. Everything. Wasnt even getting sex either. Now I have nothing to show for it except rage.
Marcus: My brotha, what you feelin is BLUEPILL rage. Anyone that studied hoeconomics knows women CANNOT love men the same way men love women. A woman’s love is contingent upon our capacity to maintain that love in spite of a woman’s hypergamy. Women love conditionally brotha, men are the true romantics. Study hoeconomics and just accept what is and move on to something better with that newfound knowledge.
Marcus: My brotha, what you feelin is BLUEPILL rage. Anyone that studied hoeconomics knows women CANNOT love men the same way men love women. A woman’s love is contingent upon our capacity to maintain that love in spite of a woman’s hypergamy. Women love conditionally brotha, men are the true romantics. Study hoeconomics and just accept what is and move on to something better with that newfound knowledge.